References [12 ]
Hoef-Emden K, Tran H & Melkonian M (2005) Lineage-specific variations of congruent evolution among DNA sequences from three genomes, and relaxed selective constraints on rbcL in Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae). BMC Evolutionary Biology 5: 56.
Hoef-Emden K (2007) Revision of the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae) II: incongruencies between the classical morphospecies concept and molecular phylogeny in smaller pyrenoid-less cells. Phycologia 46: 402-428.
Hoef-Emden K (2008) Molecular phylogeny of phycocyanin-containing cryptophytes: Evolution of biliproteins and geographical distribution. Journal of Phycology 44: 985-993.
Hoef-Emden K & Melkonian M (2003) Revision of the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae): A combination of molecular phylogeny and morphology provides insights into a long-hidden dimorphism. Protist 154: 371-409.
Beaton MJ & Cavalier-Smith T (1999) Eukaryotic non-coding DNA is functional: Evidence from the differential scaling of cryptomonad genomes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 266: 2053-2059.
Schluter L, Lauridsen TL, Krogh G & Jorgensen T (2006) Identification and quantification of phytoplankton groups in lakes using new pigment rations - a comparison between pigment analysis by HPLC and microscopy. Freshwater Biology 51: 1474-1485.
Hoef-Emden K (2014) Osmotolerance in the Crpytophyceae: Jacks-of-all-trades in the Chroomonas clade. Protist 165: 123-143.
Hoef-Emden K (2012) Pitfalls of establishing DNA barcoding systems in protists: The Cryptophyceae as a test case. PLoS ONE 7: e43652.
Choi B, Son M, Kim JI & Shin W (2013) Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae, Cryptophyta) from Korea. Algae 28: 307-330.
Lane CE, Khan H, MacKinnon M, Fong A, Theophilou S & Archibald JM (2006) Insight into the diversity and evolution of the cryptomonad nucleomorph genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 856-865.
Bácsi I, B-Béres V, Kókai Z, Gonda S, Novák Z, Nagy SA & Vasas G (2016) Effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on cyanobacteria and algae in laboratory strains and in natural algal assemblages. Environmental Pollution 212: 508-518.
Hoef-Emden K (2018) Revision of the genus Chroomonas Hansgirg: The benefits of DNA-containing specimens Protist -: -.
Sequences [4 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
Division/Phylum: Cryptophyta Class: Cryptophyceae Order: Cryptomonadales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium:MWC; Bacteria present; maintained by serial subculture;or BG11, JM
Attributes
AuthorityGeitler emend. Hoef-Emden & Melkonian 2003
IsolatorPringsheim (1939)
Collection Site Musikantenteich, Hirschberg, Austria
Area Europe
Country Austria
Environment Freshwater
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 572022
Equivalent StrainsSAG 979-3,UTEX 358
Formerly Listed in CCAP asCryptomonas ovata var. palustris Pringsheim

CCAP979/61

Cryptomonas pyrenoidifera


Related Products