References [ 14 ]
Andersen RA, Brett RW, Potter D & Sexton JP (1998) Phylogeny of the Eustigmatophyceae based upon 18S rDNA, with emphasis on Nannochloropsis. Protist 149: 61-74.
Baker KM, Gobler CJ & Collier JL (2009) Urease gene sequences from algae and heterotrophic bacteria in axenic and nonaxenic phytoplankton cultures. Journal of Phycology 45: 625-634.
Lopez Barreiro D, Zamalloa C, Boon N, Vyverman W, Ronsse F, Brilman W & Prins W (2013) Influence of strain-specific parameters on hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae Bioresource Technology 146: 463-471.
Cai T, Park SY, Racharaks R & Li Y (2013) Cultivation of Nannochloropsis salina using anaerobic digestion effluent as a nutrient source or biofuel production. Applied Energy 108: 486-492.
Sheets JP, Ge X, Park SY & Li Y (2013) Effect of outdoor conditions on Nannochloropsis salina cultivation in artificial seawater using nutrients from anaerobic digestion effluent. Bioresource Technology 152: 154-161.
Beacham TA, Bradley C, White DA, Bond P & Ali ST (2014) Lipid productivity and cell wall ultrastructure of six strains of Nannochloropsis: Implications for biofuel production and downstream processing. Algal Research 6: 64-69.
Slocombe SP, Zhang QY, Ross M, Anderson A, Thomas NJ, Lapresa A, Rad Menéndez C, Campbell CN, Black KD, Stanley MS & Day JG (2015) Unlocking nature's treasure-chest: Screening for oleaginous algae. Scientific Reports 5: 09844.
Barbano D, Diaz R, Zhang L, Sandrin T, Gerken H & Dempster T (2015) Rapid characterization of microalgae and microalgae mixtures using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) PLoS ONE 10(8): e0135337.
Saba B, Christy AD, Yu Z, Co AC, Islam R & Tuovinen OH (2016) Characterization and performance of anodic mixed culture biofilms in submersed microbial fuel cells. Bioelectrochemistry 113: 79-84.
Taleb A, Kandilian R, Touchard R, Montalescot V, Rinaldi T, Taha S, Takache H, Marchal L, Legrand J & Pruvost J (2016) Screening of freshwater and seawater microalgal strains in fully controlled photobioreactors for biodiesel production. Bioresource Technology 218: 480-490.
Fawley MW, Jameson I & Fawley KP (2015) The phylogeny of the genus Nannochloropsis (Monodopsidaceae, Eustigmatophyceae), with descriptions of N. australis sp. nov. and Microchloropsis gen. nov.. Phycologia 54: 545-552.
Verma R & Srivastava A (2018) Carbon dioxide sequestration and its enhanced utilization by photoautotroph microalgae Environmental Development -: -.
Macías-Sánchez MD, Robles-Medina A, Jiménez-Callejón MJ, Hita-Pena E, Estéban-Cerdán L, González-Moreno PA, Navarro-López E & Molina-Grima E (2018) Optimization of biodiesel production from wet microalgal biomass by direct transesterification using the surface response methodology Renewable Energy 129: 141-149.
Parsy A, Monlau F, Guyoneaud R & Sambusiti C (2024) Nutrient recovery in effluents from the energy sectors for microalgae and cyanobacteria biomass production: A review Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 191: 114207.
Sequences [ 4 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
18S
Division/Phylum: Heterokontophyta/Ochrophyta Class: Eustigmatophyceae Order: Eustigmatales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: SNA; Minimal or unobserved bacteria under normal growth conditions; maintained by serial subculture;
Attributes
Authority(Lubián) Fawley, Jameson & Fawley 2015
IsolatorRyther (1952)
Collection Site Great South Bay, Long Island, New York, USA
Notes Renamed Apr17 after taxonomic revision (DOI:10.2216/15-60.1)
Axenicity Status Minimal or unobserved bacteria under normal growth conditions
Area North America
Country USA
Environment Marine
GMO No
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date 1952
Original Designation GSB Sticho
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet SM_GeneralMarineGreens.pdf
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 1370287
Equivalent StrainsCCMP527
Synonyms Nannochloropsis gaditana Lubián 1982
Formerly Listed in CCAP asNannochloropsis salina Hibberd 1981,Nannochloropsis gaditana

CCAP 849/6

Microchloropsis gaditana