References [ 2 ]
Kher CP, Doerder FP, Cooper J, Ikonomi P, Achilles-Day U, Küpper FC & Lynn DH (2010) Barcoding Tetrahymena: Discriminating species and identifying unknowns using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox-1) barcode. Protist 162: 2-13.
Doerder FP (2018) Barcodes Reveal 48 New Species of Tetrahymena, Dexiostoma, and Glaucoma: Phylogeny, Ecology, and Biogeography of New and Established Species Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology -: -.
Sequences [ 1 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
Division/Phylum: Ciliates/Ciliophora Class: Oligohymenophorea
Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology
and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee
that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive
from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and
Adl et al. (2019) for protists.
Attributes |
Authority | Kahl 1926 |
Isolator | Foissner (1995) |
Collection Site | directly from sludge, activated sludge plant Siggerwiesen, Salzburg, Austria |
Notes |
From time to time some pieces of mealworm larvae should be added. |
Axenicity Status |
Bacteria and other organisms present |
Area |
Europe |
Country |
Austria |
Environment |
Soil |
GMO |
No |
Group |
Protozoa |
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol |
No |
ABS Note |
Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain. |
Collection Date |
1995 |
Pathogen |
Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1 |
Strain Maintenance Sheet |
|
Toxin Producer |
Not Toxic / No Data |
Type Culture |
Yes |
Taxonomy WoRMS ID |
|
Synonyms |
Saprophilus mobilis
|