Product videos

References [ 2 ]
Day JG, Thomas NJ, Achilles-Day UEM & Leakey RJG (2012) Early detection of protozoan grazers in algal biofuel cultures. Bioresource Technology 114: 715-719.
Wang W, Shor LM, LeBoeuf EJ, Wikswo JP, Taghon GL & Kosson DS (2008) Protozoan migration in bent microfluidic channels. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74: 1945-1949.
Sequences [ 2 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
Division/Phylum: Ciliates/Ciliophora

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: ASWP; Bacteria present; maintained by serial subculture; add boiled wheat grain
Attributes
Authority(Müller) Minkjewicz 1901
IsolatorGates (1977)
Collection Sitefrom Shrimp Culture project Kuwait
Notes Isolated at CCAP
Axenicity Status Bacteria present
Area Asia
Country Kuwait
Environment Marine
GMO No
Group Protozoa
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date c 1977
Original Designation Kuwait/4
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 417119
Synonyms Moneuplotes vannus

CCAP 1624/12

Euplotes vannus