References [ 1 ]
Clayden SL & Saunders GW (2014) A study of two Acrochaetium complexes in Canada with distinction of Rhododrewia gen. nov. (Acrochaetiales, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 53: 221-232.
Sequences [ 2 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
Division/Phylum: Rhodophyta Class: Florideophyceae Order: Acrochaetiales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: ASW; Bacteria and other organisms present; maintained by serial subculture; (use 12.5ml l-1 soil extract)
Attributes
AuthorityHowe 1914
IsolatorKuiper (1981)
Collection Sitedrift material, epiphytic on Cystoseira baccata Texel Stroom, Holland, Netherlands
Notes the gametophyte of A. densum (Drew) Papenfuss; This macroalgal culture contains bacteria and probably other organisms in low numbers, we are happy to provide further info on specific strains if you contact us
Axenicity Status Bacteria and other organisms present
Area Europe
Country Netherlands
Environment Marine
GMO No
Group Macroalgae
Latitude 53.06 N
Longitude 4.45 E
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date c1981
Original Designation 681
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 144334

CCAP 1350/14

Acrochaetium catenulatum