References [ 6 ]
Choi H-J, Kim B-H, Kim J-D & Han M-S (2005) Streptomyces neyagawaensis as a control for the hazardous biomass of Microcystis aeruginosa (Cyanobacteria) in eutrophic freshwaters. Biological Control 33: 335-343.
Maberly SC, Courcelle C, Groben R & Gontero B (2010) Phylogenetically-based variation in the regulation of the Calvin cycle enzymes, phophoribulokinase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, in algae. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 735-745.
Kang YH, Jung SW, Jo SH & Han MS (2011) Field assessment of the potential of algicidal bacteria against diatom blooms. Biocontrol Science and Technology 21: 969-984.
Fanesi A, Wagner H, Becker A & Wilhelm C (2016) Temperature affects the partitioning of absorbed light energy in freshwater phytoplankton Freshwater Biology 61: 1365-1378.
Fanesi A, Wagner H & Wilhelm C (2017) Phytoplankton growth rate modelling: Can spectroscopic cell chemotyping be superior to physiological predictors? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 284: 20161956.
Hmimina G, Hulot FD, Humbert JF, Quiblier C, Tambosco K, Lemaire BJ, Vincon-Leite B, Audebert L & Soudani K (2019) Linking phytoplankton pigment composition and optical properties: A framework for developing remote-sensing metrics for monitoring cyanobacteria Water Research 148: 504-514.
Division/Phylum: Heterokontophyta/Ochrophyta Class: Coscinodiscophyceae Order: Aulacoseirales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: DM; Bacteria present; maintained by serial subculture;
Attributes
Authority(Ehrenberg) Simonsen 1979
IsolatorGibson (1981)
Collection Site Loughgall, Northern Ireland, UK
Climatic Zone Temperate
Notes Isolation: micropipetting, dilution; clonal
Axenicity Status Bacteria present
Area Europe
Country UK
Environment Freshwater
GMO No
Group Diatom
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date c 1981
Original Designation FBA L383
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet SM_FreshwaterDiatoms.pdf
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 148961

CCAP 1002/1

Aulacoseira granulata


Related Products

Diatom Medium (DM)<br>CONCENTRATED STOCKS

CCAP FADM-C
Diatom Medium (DM)
CONCENTRATED STOCKS

Non-sterile concentrated stocks to make up 5 litres of DM medium. Diatom Medium is used for culturi

Diatom Medium (DM)<br>1 LITRE PREMADE

CCAP FADM-P
Diatom Medium (DM)
1 LITRE PREMADE

1 litre of sterile, ready to use, DM medium. Diatom Medium is used for culturing freshwater diatoms