References [ 5 ]
Rampen SW, Datema M, Rodrigo-Gámiz M, Schouten S, Reichart GJ & Sinninghe Damsté JS (2014) Sources and proxy potential of long chain alkyl diols in lacustrine environments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 144: 59-71.
Slocombe SP, Zhang QY, Ross M, Anderson A, Thomas NJ, Lapresa A, Rad Menéndez C, Campbell CN, Black KD, Stanley MS & Day JG (2015) Unlocking nature's treasure-chest: Screening for oleaginous algae. Scientific Reports 5: 09844.
Kryvenda A, Rybalka N, Wolf M & Friedl T (2018) Species distinctions among closely related strains of Eustigmatophyceae (Stramenopiles) emphasizing ITS2 sequence-structure data: Eustigmatos and Vischeria European Journal of Phycology 53(4): 471-491.
Hughes AH, Magot F, Tawfike A, Rad-Menéndez C, Thomas N, Young LC, Stucchi L, Carettoni D, Stanley MS, Edrada-Ebel R & Duncan KR (2021) Exploring the chemical space of macro- and micro- algae using comparative metabolomics Microorganisms 9: 311.
Hughes AH, Magot F, Tawfike AF, Rad Menéndez C, Thomas N, Young LC, Stucchi L, Carettoni D, Stanley MS, Edrada-EBel R & Duncan KR (2021) Exploring the chemical space of macro- and micro-algae using comparative metabolomics. Microorganisms 9: 311.
Sequences [ 1 ]
EMBL/Genbank Links
(Bold text = submission by CCAP staff or collaborators)
18S-28S
Division/Phylum: Heterokontophyta/Ochrophyta Class: Eustigmatophyceae Order: Eustigmatales

Note: for strains where we have DNA barcodes we can be reasonably confident of identity, however for those not yet sequenced we rely on morphology and the original identification, usually made by the depositor. Although CCAP makes every effort to ensure the correct taxonomic identity of strains, we cannot guarantee that a strain is correctly identified at the species, genus or class levels. On this basis users are responsible for confirming the identity of the strain(s) they receive from us on arrival before starting experiments.
For strain taxonomy we generally use AlgaeBase for algae and Adl et al. (2019) for protists.

Culture media, purity and growth conditions:
Medium: 3N-BBM+V; Bacteria and other organisms present; maintained by serial subculture and cryopreserved; very low level bacteria and nanoflagellates
Attributes
AuthorityHibberd 1981
IsolatorTrenkwalder (1975)
Collection Site Brixen, Austria
Axenicity Status Bacteria and other organisms present
Area Europe
Country Austria
Environment Soil
GMO No
In Scope of Nagoya Protocol No
ABS Note Collected pre Nagoya Protocol. No known Nagoya Protocol restrictions for this strain.
Collection Date c 1975
Original Designation Innsbruck T8 as Pleurochloris magna
Pathogen Not pathogenic: Hazard Class 1
Strain Maintenance Sheet
Toxin Producer Not Toxic / No Data
Type Culture No
Taxonomy WoRMS ID 616526

CCAP 860/7

Eustigmatos vischeri


Related Products

3N-BBM+V Medium<br>CONCENTRATED STOCKS

CCAP FA3N-C
3N-BBM+V Medium
CONCENTRATED STOCKS

Non-sterile concentrated stocks to make up 5 litres of 3N-BBM+V medium. 3N-BBM+V medium is used for

3N-BBM+V Medium<br>1 LITRE PREMADE

CCAP FA3N-P
3N-BBM+V Medium
1 LITRE PREMADE

1 litre of sterile, ready to use, 3N-BBM+V medium. 3N-BBM+V medium is used for culturing freshwater